| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Economic Evaluation of Interventions to Reduce Road Traffic injuries - A Review of the Literature with Applications to Low and Middie-income CountriesDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA, hwaters{at}jhsph.edu
Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA Road Traffic Injuries (RTIs) kill over one million people worldwide annually. This article takes the perspective of economic costs and benefits to review the impact of available road safety interventions in industrialized countries - and the potential effect of these interventions in low and middle-income countries, where RTIs pose an increasingly large public health problem. A comprehensive review of the literature on cost-benefits and cost-effectiveness studies related to road traffic injuries internationally, with comparisons of costs adjusted for inflation and exchange differentials was conducted. In the United States (US), motor vehicle inspection laws resulted in annual savings of US $1.7 to $2.3 billion. The installation of seatbelts results in net savings of $162 per vehicle; with benefits outweighing costs by a factor ranging from 240 to 1,727. Other cost effective interventions include mandatory seatbelt use, lowering speed limits, motorcycle helmet laws, and traffic calming devices such as speed bumps and road deviations. The dearth of similar economic evaluations of interventions for road traffic injuries in low and middle-income countries represents a serious research gap and hinders the implementation of effective strategies in those countries. Asia Pac J Public Health 2004; 16(1): 23-31.
Key Words: Economic evaluation road traffic injuries road traffic interventions cost-effectiveness analysis cost-benefit analysis injury interventions.
Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health, Vol. 16, No. 1,
23-31 (2004) This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||||||
